Zoglio v. Zoglio

ROVER, Chief Judge.

Appellant’s suit for the annulment of his marriage was dismissed by the trial court. The action, which was undefended, was brought pursuant to the general fraud provision of our domestic relations act 1 and although the complaint is no model of clarity, it alleges that the appellee, for the purpose of inducing, appellant to marry her, fraudulently represented that she would live and cohabit naturally with him.

The parties were married in the District of Columbia on April 3, 1959; eleven days later they separated. Prior to the marriage they discussed the possibilities of…