Legal Opinion

Major v. CSX Transportation

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 18, 2003No. CIV.A. DKC 96-3940PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHASANOW, District Judge.

Presently pending and ready for resolution in this case arising from a train collision are: (1) the motion of Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) for summary judgment; (2) the motion of Defendant National Passenger Railroad Corporation (Amtrak) for summary judgment; and (3) the motion of both Defendants CSXT and Amtrak to strike Plaintiffs references to National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) report materials. The issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is deemed necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For reasons that follow, the court will…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nickels v. Grand Trunk Western RR, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Baron Financial Corp. v. NatanzonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
  4. Tufariello v. Long Island Rail RoadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  5. McCain v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API