Legal Opinion
Edo Corp. v. Newark Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 16, 1995No. Civ. H-90-951 (AHN)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF DEFENDANTS’ POLICIES’ POLLUTION EXCLUSION CLAUSES
NEVAS, District Judge.
Plaintiff EDO Corporation (“EDO”) commenced this declaratory judgment action against primary insurers, Newark Insurance Co. (“Newark”) and Aetna Insurance Company (“Aetna”) and against excess insurers Burnhope and Companies (“Burnhope”) and American Insurance Company (“American”) (collectively “the insurers”), seeking a declaration that it is entitled to insurance coverage for expenditures it incurred in connection with environmental contamination.
The final determination of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Cora Aldrich v. Randolph Central School District and Cattaraugus County Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Wallis & CompaniesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Duplan Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Roberts v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Allianz Global Risks v. ACE Property & Casualty Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Stamford Wallpaper Company, Inc. v. Tig InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.