Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 13, 1982No. DA215859-8107, CA A23697PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

The City of Portland appeals an order of the district court granting defendant’s demurrer to a complaint charging him with “unlawful camping.” The court held that the ordinance under which defendant was charged is unconstitutionally vague under the Oregon Constitution. We reverse.

The ordinance 1 prohibits “camping”

“* * * in or upon any sidewalk, street, alley, lane, public right-of-way or any other place to which the general public has access, or under any bridgeway or viaduct * * *.”

The ordinance provides that “ ‘to camp’ means to set up or to remain in or at, a campsite.” “Campsite” is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. BlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State of Oregon v. WojahnOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State v. SamterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. BeltranHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API