City of Portland v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
The City of Portland appeals an order of the district court granting defendant’s demurrer to a complaint charging him with “unlawful camping.” The court held that the ordinance under which defendant was charged is unconstitutionally vague under the Oregon Constitution. We reverse.
The ordinance 1 prohibits “camping”
“* * * in or upon any sidewalk, street, alley, lane, public right-of-way or any other place to which the general public has access, or under any bridgeway or viaduct * * *.”
The ordinance provides that “ ‘to camp’ means to set up or to remain in or at, a campsite.” “Campsite” is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. BlockerOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State of Oregon v. WojahnOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. SamterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. BeltranHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986