Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Roberts

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1927No. Docket No. 5724PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.

An action was commenced in the superior court of Alameda County to recover on a written contract for the payment of money. The defendant, who is the appellant here, filed with his demurrer to the complaint a demand and motion for a change of venue to Los Angeles County, where, according to his affidavit of merits, he resides. The motion was denied, and the appeal was taken from the order.

It is alleged in the affidavit mentioned that defendant “fully stated all of the facts relating to said demand in this action to his counsel herein.” We are of the"opinion that a statement “of all the facts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sewell v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Nickerson v. California Raisin Co.California Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Rey v. BarclayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People ex rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. LarueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Estate of YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. DeMonbrun v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Hobbs v. Town of Hot SpringsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Mann v. MannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Stafford v. WareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Fernandez v. FernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API