Legal Opinion
Mann v. Mann
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 11, 1946No. Civ. No. 13050PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued upon a promissory note. The cause was tried to a jury and at the close of the trial the court directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.
The note in suit was executed by defendant on December 22, 1939. The complaint pleads it in haeo verba. It calls for the payment on demand of $25,000 with interest at 6 per cent, *35and, in case of suit for collection, the payment of “a reasonable attorney’s fee to be fixed by the court.” The defendant in his answer admitted the- execution of the note and set up seven special defenses which were attacked by the plaintiff in a pretrial motion to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Meyers v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Willson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Estate of PailheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- DeMonbrun v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Estate of WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Estate of McSweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Reed v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.