Legal Opinion
Bravard v. Curran
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 20, 2004No. CA2003-01-009PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William W. Young, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, William R. and Faye Curran, appeal from a judgment of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Marcia M. Bravard, in an adverse possession case.
{¶ 2} The parties own adjacent lots on Hollywood Court in the Royal Oaks subdivision in West Chester, Ohio. The parties have been neighbors for over 28 years. In August 2001, the Currans had their property surveyed. The survey revealed that a triangular-shaped strip of property used by Bravard was actually situated on the Currans’…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Dupler v. Mansfield Journal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
- Brewer v. Cleveland City Schools Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- Grace v. KochOhio Supreme Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Roberts v. RMB Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Vanderbilt v. Pier 27, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Franchas Holdings, L.L.C. v. DameronOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Uhl v. Thomas, Ca2008-06-131 (1-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Bank of New York Mellon v. PutmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.