Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Olson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 4, 1990No. 10228-9-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, C.J.

Christopher Kerr appeals a summary judgment dismissing Drs. Craig Olson and Charles Wolfe from this medical malpractice action. Mr. Kerr contends the court erred in (1) refusing to grant his motion for a continuance, and (2) determining the doctors were coworkers under the state Industrial Insurance Act, thus immune from a third party tort action.

Mr. Kerr was employed by Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation as a pot room laborer at the company's Mead plant. On July 26, 1985, he experienced a sudden pain in his right leg as he bent over to pick up a heavy piece of bath (waste product from…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ross v. Erickson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Garcia v. IsersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Lloyd's of Yakima Floor Center v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  5. White v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Darensburg v. Tobey, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  2. Silliman v. Argus Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Daniels v. Seattle SeahawksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API