Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Seattle Seahawks

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 17, 1998No. 40073-8-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

David Daniels, a former Seattle Seahawks football player, filed suit against Dr. Merrit K. Auld, one of the Seahawks’ team physicians, for negligence in the diagnosis and treatment of his work-related injury. Dr. Auld successfully moved for summary judgment under the Industrial Insurance Act’s (IIA or the Act) immunity provision for coemployees. Daniels appeals, arguing that although Dr. Auld performed his duties under an employment agreement with the Seahawks, genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether: (1) Dr. Auld’s work for the Seahawks constitutes employment under the IIA’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Novenson v. Spokane Culvert & Fabricating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Manor v. Nestle Food Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. DuVon v. Rockwell InternationalWashington Supreme Court · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Department of Labor & Industries v. Lyons Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Tatum v. Medical University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Morris Byrd v. Hansen Beverage Company d/b/a Monster Beverage Corporation; Monster Energy Company; Monster Energy International Company; Monster Energy US, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026
  4. Tatum v. Medical University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API