Currier v. Hallowell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This is an action to recover a share of the proceeds of certain patents and patented articles. The defences are a general denial and the statute of limitations. The case was tried before a judge, without a jury, and comes before us on exceptions to the refusal of the court to rule that the plaintiff could not maintain his action, and also that the relation between the parties was a partnership, and that the plaintiff could only recover a share in the profits after deducting all expenses and charges.
At the trial an auditor’s report was put in, and although there was other evidence the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Railroad Co. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Somerby v. BuntinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Smith v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Blood v. BloodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berwin v. CableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Eno v. Prime Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Robinson v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Richardson Shoe Machinery Co. v. Essex Machine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Southern Lead Corp. v. GlassSupreme Court of Florida · 1931