Legal Opinion

Smith v. Edwards

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 6, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This case comes before us on the exception of the Old Colony Railroad Company to a ruling of the court below, that it should be charged as trustee of the defendants. The defendants have been defaulted. The bill of exceptions purports to state the evidence introduced on the motion to charge the trustee, but does not disclose the findings of the judge. We assume them to have been the most favorable for the ruling which the bill of exceptions warrants. The defendants in Ohio ordered of the plaintiffs, who are manufacturers of boots and shoes in Massachusetts, through the plaintiffs’ travelling…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goddard v. BinneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Blanchard v. CookeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Kline v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  4. Hallgarten v. OldhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Nichols v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alden v. HartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Peterson v. Universal Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Rastetter v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Mark P. Miller Milling Co. v. Butterfield-Elder Implement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Shohfi v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API