Legal Opinion
Patrick Media Group, Inc. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
Decided June 23, 1994No. 11-93-246-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCLOUD, Chief Justice.
This is a condemnation suit. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) filed a condemnation proceeding in county court at law against Harris, Clayton, Schulz, Inc. (Harris), the owner of the land. Patrick Media Group, Inc. (Patrick) held a leasehold interest in the land for the operation of a billboard and was added as a defendant in DART’s first amended petition. The condemnation proceeding was set for a hearing before special commissioners on June 22, 1993.
On the day of the hearing, DART filed a motion to nonsuit Patrick,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pearson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Sinclair v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Rose v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Rosenthal v. Ottis, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- Board of Regents of University of Tex. Sys. v. PuettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- City of McKinney v. Eldorado Park, LTD., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006
- State v. Rodger A. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Adriene Sibley v. Port Freeport, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024
- City of McKinney, Texas v. Eldorado Park, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.