Legal Opinion

Mayes v. Ramos

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 2023No. A172429PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

640 Argued and submitted June 6, supplemental judgment reversed and remanded August 30, 2023 Kelly MAYES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony RAMOS, Defendant-Respondent. Clackamas County Circuit Court 18CV25192; A172429

536 P3d 638

Plaintiff appeals a supplemental judgment denying her request for attor- ney fees-on-fees. The trial court denied plaintiff’s fee request on four separate bases: that it was (1) barred by entry and satisfaction of a prior general judgment; (2) barred by claim preclusion principles; (3) “excessive and without merit”; and (4) “frivolous.” On appeal, plaintiff challenges…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Strawn v. Farmers Ins. Co. of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mayes v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API