Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Moriarty

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 19, 2013No. AC 33928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALVORD, J.

The plaintiff, William Arnold, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants, Carol Moriarty and James Moriarty,1 following a jury trial. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) directed a verdict in favor of the defendants, and (2) denied the plaintiffs motion to set aside the verdict.2 We disagree with the plaintiff and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

*874The following facts, which the jury could have reasonably found, and procedural history are relevant to the plaintiffs claims. On October 3, 2003, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hall v. BergmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Right v. BreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Ferris v. Hotel Pick Arms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  4. Froom Development Corp. v. Developers Realty, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Macy v. LucasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rendahl v. PelusoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Weihing v. Preto-RodasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API