Legal Opinion
Sederquist v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 13, 1987No. CV-R-84-295-ECRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
EDWARD C. REED, Jr., Chief Judge.
Defendant, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (“TRPA”), has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs, David N. and Marilyn Sederquist, moved for summary judgment on two of their three claims for relief.
I
BACKGROUND
In 1968, the states of California and Nevada entered an interstate agreement designed to insure conservation of resources and control of development in the Lake Tahoe Basin. That agreement, known as the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact (“1969 Compact”), became…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Montana v. Blackfeet Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tahoe Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1992
- Carpenter v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1992
- Tahoe Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1992
- S & M Investment Co. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1988
- Bourne v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1993