Legal Opinion

(PS) Bryan v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 24, 2023No. 2:21-cv-02340Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENT M. BRYAN, No. 2:21-cv-2340 TLN AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER and 14 TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AGENCY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and the case was accordingly referred to the 19 undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Following an initial scheduling hearing that took place on 20 June 29, 2022 (ECF No. 13), defendants moved for partial judgment on the pleadings and partial 21 summary judgment, such that all claims will be…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API