Legal Opinion

Bank IV Oklahoma, N.A. v. Southwestern Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 18, 1997No. 86910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMERS, Vice Chief Justice.

Two banks are litigating which of them should bear the loss for a check drawn on a closed account. The merits of that dispute are not before us at this time. Our review today is limited to Bank IV’s motion to dismiss Southwestern Bank’s appeal.1 By unpublished order we previously granted the motion. We now grant rehearing, vacate the order of dismissal, and deny Bank IV’s motion to dismiss. We conclude that the appeal was timely filed, and allow it to proceed.

The posture of the case is that a motion for summary judgment was sustained for Plaintiff, Bank IV, in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seitsinger v. Dockum Pontiac Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. MBA Commercial Construction, Inc. v. Roy J. Hannaford Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Texas Oklahoma Express v. SorensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. McMillian v. HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Puckett v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whitehall Homeowners, Ass'n v. Appletree Enterprise, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Bank IV Oklahoma, N.A. v. Southwestern Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Davuluri v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure & SupervisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Opinion No. (2000), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2000
  5. State v. GILLECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API