Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Burns v. Buckland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1929PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.

This is a suit to set aside a deed. The defendants pleaded former adjudication. The court sustained the plea and plaintiff has appealed.

The facts are as follows: On and prior to December 9, 1921, Starr Buckland, the husband of defendant Mattie Buckland, was the owner-of 160 acres of land in Harney County and also of a house and two lots in Crane and owed a large sum of money to the First National Bank of Burns, credit for which he had partly obtained by reason of his said ownership, he having enumerated said property from time to time in his statement of assets to the bank. On said day…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Morrill v. MorrillOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Glenn v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  5. White v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1902

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Henderson v. United States Radiator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. Bennett v. CITY OF SALEMOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Winters v. BisaillonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Norwood v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Western Baptist Home Mission Board v. GriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API