Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Elia Iannelli, A/K/A Bobby I

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 26, 1976No. 75--1876PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying without an evidentiary hearing appellants’ motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Fed.R.Crim.P. 33. Appellants were convicted of violations of the federal anti-gambling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1955, and of conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371. Appellant Iannelli was also convicted of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1302 and 1342 (gambling offenses involving use of the United States Postal Service). The convictions were affirmed by this court 1 and by the Supreme Court. 2

The government’s case was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. State v. PrudholmSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Manfred DerewalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Neil Saada and Isaac Saada, A/K/A ZuckieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Thomas P. JasinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API