Legal Opinion

United States v. Manfred Derewal

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 8, 1993No. 93-1152PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALITO, Circuit Judge:

Manfred DeRewal appeals from a district court order denying his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Adopting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the district court held, among other things, that DeRewal had not shown “cause” pursuant to United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 102 S.Ct. 1584, 71 L.Ed.2d 816 (1982), for not raising his ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal or in his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We hold that the “cause arid prejudice” standard set out in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Tyrone Anthony GrayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. United States v. George Don GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Daryl O. McCleese v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Percy TravillionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API