Legal Opinion

Briggs v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 3, 1911No. 311PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 23555 (T. D. 30710).

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Judge

Appellant herein imported certain chinaware into the United States on March 5, 1907. The merchandise was advanced in value by the appraiser, and was the subject of a reappraisement by a general appraiser, who sustained the entered value. A further reappraisement was had by a board of three general appraisers, under the provisions of section 13 of the act of June 10, 1890, which resulted in the board’s advancing the goods 5 per cent above the entered value. The importer protested, and appealed from this decision to the Board *409of United States General Appraisers, which, after refusing to admit…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Auffmordt v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Robertson v. Frank Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Hilton v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Greely's Administrator v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1856

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kuttroff v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Oelrichs & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API