Legal Opinion

United States v. Jordan

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 28, 1989No. 58,976; NMCM 86 1006PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COX, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant stands convicted of conspiracy to commit robbery, robbery, and murder while engaged in the perpetration of robbery, in violation of Articles 81, 122, and 118, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 881, 922, and 918, respectively.1 His approved sentence is a dishonorable discharge, confinement for life, total forfeitures, and reduction to E-l. We granted review of this issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED BY ADMITTING APPELLANT’S STATEMENTS, MADE WITHOUT COUNSEL PRESENT, TO A CIVILIAN DETECTIVE AND A NAVAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE AGENT…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. OakleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. AnkenyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. JordanU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API