Robertson v. Detroit Pattern Works
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Garnishment proceedings by Charles R. Robertson against Charles W. Wipfler and others; garnishees of the Detroit Pattern'Works, and others. There was an order dismissing the writ, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
The garnishee defendant was appointed by the circuit court for the county of Wayne receiver in a certain suit wherein he and the principal defendants were parties. That suit was tried. It resulted in a final decree requiring the garnishee defendant to pay to the principal defendants in this suit a certain sum of money. It appears that nothing remains to be done except the performance of this decree, viz., the payment of said money. The' question presented by this case is whether plaintiff, a creditor of the principal defendants, has a right without leave of the court to commence garnishment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dunsmoor v. FurstenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Weaver v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Smith v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
3Cited by5 opinions
- Challenge Co. v. SartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Doggett v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. BlumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Ewing v. Ewing Planing Mill Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- People ex rel. Wipfler v. WipflerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911