Legal Opinion

State v. Blum

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChRistiaNSON, J.

This is a sequel to State v. Blum, 57 N. D. 619, 223 N. W. 697. That was an action brought by the state against the defendant Dave Blum as principal and the defendants Lyman Brokaw and Lorenz Sowitch, as sureties on a bail bond. This is a garnishment action instituted ancillary to the other action and grew out of the following facts: the defendant Lyman Brokaw was charged with violation of the prohibition law, and was arrested upon a warrant of arrest issued by one A. L. Butler, a justice of the peace in and for Williams County. After hearing had before the justice of the peace said Brokaw…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dunsmoor v. FurstenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Leroy v. Jacobosky.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Dunlop v. . Patterson Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Boylan v. HinesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State v. BlumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  2. Walsvik v. BrandelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Allen v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API