Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 23, 2016No. 71/15PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

Petitioner, Stephen Blair Jackson, in 2015 filed a petition for DNA testing pursuant to Section 8-201 of the Criminal Procedure Article of the Maryland Code. 1 In his Petition, Jackson alleged that testing a piece of underwear for the presence of his DNA as well as testing of additional material collected on laboratory microscope slides, which remained from a Sexual Assault Forensics Exam (“SAFE”) that had been performed on a victim, known as Patricia M., in 1998, “ha[ve] the potential to show that Petitioner’s DNA is not on the complainant’s underwear, evidence that would have been…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Pickett v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Anne Arundel County Board of Education v. NorvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. State Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Franklin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Beaman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Jamison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API