Legal Opinion

District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 18, 2009No. 08-6PublishedCited by 696 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts

DNA testing has an unparalleled ability both to exonerate the wrongly convicted and to identify the guilty. It has the potential to significantly improve both the criminal justice system and police investigative practices. The Federal Government and the States have recognized this, and have developed special approaches to ensure that this evidentiary tool can be effectively incorporated into established criminal procedure — usually but not always through legislation.

Against this prompt and considered response, the respondent, William Osborne, proposes a different approach: the rec*56ognition of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by696 opinions

  1. Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Obergefell v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. McDaniel v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

691 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API