Legal Opinion
Davis v. Enget
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 2010No. 20090329PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Anthony Davis appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his legal malpractice action against Wade Enget. We affirm, concluding Davis’ failure to present expert testimony on Enget’s alleged breach of duty precluded him from demonstrating a genuine issue of material fact exists.
I
[¶ 2] In 2002, Enget and Tom Slorby represented Davis in a medical malpractice action against UniMed Medical Center and two of his treating physicians. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, and we affirmed the subsequently entered judgment. Davis v. Killu, 2006 ND 32, ¶ 21,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Iglehart v. IglehartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Martinson Bros. v. HjellumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Riemers v. Grand Forks HeraldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Hasper v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Paulson v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Spratt v. MDU Resources Group, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Arnegard v. CaykoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- George v. VeederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.