Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hovland

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2011No. 20100043PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mary Johnson, Robert Liebl, Gregory Liebl and DeAnn Liebl (collectively, “Liebls”) appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the heirs and devisees of Lambert Hovland and Ritter, Laber & Associates, Inc. (collectively “Hovlands”), determining the ownership of certain mineral rights in real property. Because the district court did not err in denying the Liebls’ motion to amend their complaint to allege a claim for reformation of a deed and in granting the Hovlands’ motion for summary judgment, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In 1976, Mathilda Olson conveyed a 50 percent…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Richard H. Hatch, Jr. v. Department for Children, Youth and Their Families (State of Rhode Island), Steven Brown and Mary McKee ProposedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Ell v. EllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Heart River Partners v. GoetzfriedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Darby v. SWENSON, INC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wehner v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Thimjon Farms Partnership v. First International Bank & TrustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Arndt v. MakiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Bakke v. Magi-Touch Carpet One Floor & Home, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. DollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API