Legal Opinion

Arnegard v. Cayko

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2010No. 20090222PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Cameron and Mary Arnegard appealed from a summary judgment dismissing their lawsuit against Richard Cayko, Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners; Frances Olson, McKenzie County Auditor; and McKenzie County (“County”). The Arnegards argue they are entitled to a property tax exemption for the residence located on their farm. We affirm, concluding the Arnegards failed to present evidence establishing that they qualify for the tax exemption.

I

[¶ 2] The Arnegards own an agricultural operation in McKenzie County and reside in a house located on their farm. In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Narum v. Faxx Foods, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Sauby v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Schleuter v. Northern Plains Ins. Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co. v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Ltd.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. North Dakota Department of Labor Ex Rel. Johnson v. Matrix Properties Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. FelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Crandall v. CrandallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. City of Mandan v. Strata Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Grand Forks Homes, Inc. v. State ex rel. State Board of EqualizationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API