Legal Opinion
Kendall v. Trico Products Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 19, 1929No. Nos. 5084, 5125PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
Appellee brought suit in the District Court against the Perfection Products Company (a common-law trust) and Kritz and Bauer, trustees, for infringement of United States patent No. 1,522,344, issued January 6,1925, to Thomp*523son, assignor to Oishei (later assigned to plaintiff), for automatic windshield cleaner, as well as for unfair competition in connection with such infringement. Both validity of patent and unfair competition were denied.
The District Court held the patent valid and infringed, found unfair competition, awarded permanent injunction and accounting for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Rathbone, Sard & Co. v. Champion Steed Range Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Frey v. Marvel Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- James Heddon's Sons v. Millsite Steel & Wire Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Willett Mfg. Co. v. Root Spring Scraper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Underwood v. Bank of America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Trico Products Corporation v. McGowanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1946
- Callison v. PickensCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.