Callison v. Pickens
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant instituted this suit to restrain further infringement of patent No. 1,645,-370 and to recover damages for past infringement. The defenses were noninfringement, lack of invention, and anticipation. At the conclusion of the trial, the court sustained the last two defenses and dismissed the bill. This appeal followed.
The invention relates to an improvement in amusement devices having a propelling contrivance for balls, a target above the level of the propeller, and an inclined surface leading from the target to the propeller for the return of the balls after…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Proudfit Loose Leaf Co. v. Kalamazoo Loose Leaf Binder Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- O. H. Jewell Filter Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Ottumwa Box Car Loader Co. v. Christy Box Car Loader Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Laundry Mach. Co. v. StrikeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Scott & Williams, Inc. v. WhisnantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Tschappat v. Hinderliter Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Koolvent Metal Awning Corp. of America v. Kool-Vent Metal Awning Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1955
- McKay Co. v. Logan Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.