Legal Opinion
Willett Mfg. Co. v. Root Spring Scraper Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1932No. 5907, 5908PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
No. 5907 is an appeal from a decree of the District Court finding claim 4 1 of patent No. 1,750,610, issued March 11, 1930', upon application of Ernest A. Weeks, valid and infringed. In No. 5908, the complainant below, the defendant in the infringement suit, appeals from a decree refusing to “adjudge that such applicant is entitled, according to law, to receive a patent” (Rev. St. § 4915, 35 TJ. S. C. § 63 [35 USCA § 63]) for the combination set forth in certain broad generic claims which had been the subject of interference proceedings in the Patent Office, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
- Page Steel & Wire Co. v. Smith Bros. Hardware Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Huntman Stabilizer Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Span-Deck, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation v. Fab-Con, Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation and Rauenhorst Corporation, Aminnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Highway Trailer Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.