Legal Opinion

Dart v. Dart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1999No. Docket No. 110361PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

We granted leave to determine whether the parties’ English divorce judgment is entitled to full *575faith and credit under the principle of comity, and whether res judicata bars the action.1

We hold that principles of comity and res judicata mandate that the Darts’ foreign divorce judgment be enforced. The English court decided the property distribution issue on the merits, and no evidence was presented showing that plaintiff Katina Dart was denied due process. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

I. FACTS

Plaintiff and defendant were married in 1980 and were residents of Okemos, Michigan…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Board of County Road Commissioners v. SchultzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Henry v. HenryMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Adair v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Washington v. Sinai Hosp. of Greater DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Dubuc v. Green Oak TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API