Legal Opinion

Hartford Ins. Co. of Midwest v. Altomare

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 7, 2002No. 2:02-cv-02134PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BARTLE, District Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Plaintiff Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest (“Hartford”) seeks a declaration that it has no current contractual obligation either to pay uninsured motorist benefits to its insured, defendant Anne Altomare (“Altomare”), or to arbitrate her claim for such benefits. Defendant seeks a declaration that she is currently entitled to uninsured motorist benefits. In the alternative, she urges the court to permit her present eligibility to be determined by a panel of arbitrators. Before the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Vale Chemical Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Wicker v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Brennan v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Leonard Coviello Mary Coviello, H/w Ann CovielloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woodhams v. Allstate Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API