Shade v. Sisson Mill & Lumber Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County denying a new trial. Edward Sweeny, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
It was more than a year after the entry of judgment in this case when the notice of appeal from the judgment and from the order overruling the motion of defendant for a new trial was given. The appeal from the judgment has, therefore, been dismissed, and only the appeal from the order remains to be considered.
The nature of the action is fully disclosed by the second paragraph of the complaint, which reads as follows: “ That the said defendant herein is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand five hundred and ninety-seven and twenty one-hundredths dollars ($1,597.20) on account of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Janin v. London & San Francisco BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Abadie v. CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Pavisich v. BeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Whitton v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- McClain v. SchofieldNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by10 opinions
- Home Fire Insurance v. BarberNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Minor v. BaldridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Pike v. ZadigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Daly v. RuddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Donegan v. HoustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.