Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard J. Leary, and F.L. Kleinberg & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 2, 1988No. 86-2487, 86-2488PublishedCited by 207 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
The government appeals from the district court’s decision granting defendants’ motion to suppress evidence seized under a search warrant. We affirm the district court, holding that the defendants’ fourth amendment rights were infringed, that the search warrant was facially overbroad and invalid, and that the evidence seized should be suppressed.
I. Background
This appeal stems from the execution of a search warrant at the offices of the F.L. Kleinberg Company (“Kleinberg”) in Boulder, Colorado on August 23, 1984. Klein-berg and Richard J. Leary, a…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by207 opinions
- United States v. Russell R. George, AKA Rusty, and Pamela A. Johnson-Sherman, Francis R. LajoiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. James Ray ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. WicksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.