United States v. Russell R. George, AKA Rusty, and Pamela A. Johnson-Sherman, Francis R. Lajoice
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
Because everyone has some kind of secret or other, most people are anxious that their personal privacy be respected. For that very human reason the general warrant, permitting police agents to ransack one’s personal belongings, has long been considered abhorrent to fundamental notions of privacy and liberty. See Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United States, 282 U.S. 344, 357, 51 S.Ct. 153, 158, 75 L.Ed. 374 (1931). We have before us on this appeal a warrant that is, in part, so broad as to be a general warrant and which, as to that part, no reasonable police officer could…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- United States v. DaleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- United States v. Barbara E. Stefonek, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. George E. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Anthony SantaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.