Legal Opinion

In Re Allen

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1969No. Crim. 12718PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

In July 1968 petitioner’s sentence was suspended and she was placed on probation following her plea of guilty of possession of a restricted dangerous drug without prescription. (Health & Saf. Code, §11910.) By application for habeas corpus she attacks as invalid one of the terms and conditions specified by the court in its order granting probation. As will appear, we have concluded that the condition complained of was improper, is severable and does not affect the other terms and conditions of probation.

1. Availability of Habeas Corpus.

At the outset it may be noted that habeas corpus is a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API