Smith v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
NEESE, District Judge.
The defendant seeks a judgment on the pleadings in this action, Rule 12(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion is supported by a brief, and any responsive brief of the plaintiff has been waived, Rule 12(b), Revised Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee.
This is an action removed from a state court, 28 U.S.C. ch. 89, against the defendant “Proctor & Gamble” and alleging that said defendant is a foreign corporation doing business in this state. Substituted service of process on the defendant was undertaken through the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Whitson, Admr. v. T.C. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Kenney v. KillianDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1955
- Edward James Kenney, Jr. v. Honorable Raymond W. Fox, Edward James Kenney, Jr. v. Honorable Malcolm K. Hatfield, Thomas N. Robinson, Dr. Roy A. Morter, Dr. Joseph McCarthy Edward James Kenney, Jr. v. Joseph J. KillianCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. MankinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. TENNESSEE EASTMAN COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974