Legal Opinion
Hayes-Godt v. Scott Wetzel Services
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 28, 1984No. 81-08445, 82-11751 CA A30662PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
Claimant appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which affirmed the referee’s order that claimant does not have a valid aggravation claim against Scott Wetzel Services and is barred from recovery against SAIF because she did not timely file her claim. We affirm as to Scott Wetzel and reverse as to SAIF.
Claimant was initially injured on March 15, 1980, while working in the bakery of Safeway Stores, Inc. (Scott Wetzel), when she fell and sustained a fractured left wrist. The wrist did not heal properly and eventually required surgery. She returned to work on July 14, 1980, with no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Vandre v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Gronquist v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Robinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Baldwin v. Thatcher Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Argonaut Insurance v. MockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Ford v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Farmers Insurance Group v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985