Legal Opinion

Burke v. Burke

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 14, 1941No. 32,566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 297 N.W. 340. The property involved in this partition action consisted of two noncontiguous tracts of farm land. One, the "Church Farm," has an area of about 100 acres with farm buildings of conventional character. The other tract is one of about 240 acres, known as the "Home Farm." It is unique in that a part of it has become the site of an inland settlement known as "Norseland." There have been erected on it a store building, a garage, a dwelling called the "Kate Burke residence," another known as the "Henry Burke residence," and still another for the farm tenant. There are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dobberstein v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Schoonmaker v. St. Paul Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  4. Keyser v. HageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Smith v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gelin v. HollisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Briggs v. Kennedy Mayonnaise Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API