Legal Opinion

Reserve Life Ins. v. Hall

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1969No. 5-4792PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

This case relates to an employee’s scope of employment during a lunch hour. Appellant appeals from a judgment based upon a verdict of the jury holding it liable to the appellees for the negligence of appellant’s employee in an intersection accident. The jury found that at the time of the accident the employee, Mrs. Helen Christner, was acting within the scope of her employment.

For reversal appellant contends that there is no substantial evidence that at the time of the accident its employee was acting within the scope of her employment. We think appellant is correct.

On…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Healey v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Sweeden v. Atkinson Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Van Dalsen v. InmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Lindley v. McKaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  5. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. HolwerkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Wheeling Pipeline, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Williams v. Natkin & Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1981
  3. LE-HI Implement Co. of Marianna, Inc. v. White Farm Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. Le-Hi Implement Co. Of Marianna, Inc. v. White Farm Equipment Company (Formerly Oliver Corporation) and the White Motor Credit Corporation, and Ralph H. Hineman, Trustee v. Dorothy v. Leach, Flora J. Leach, John R. Walker, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API