M'Nally v. Mott
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Tenth Judicial District. The whole ease is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHeydenfeldt, Justice
Wells, Justice, concurred.
The defendant was sued and served by the name of George N. Mott, and making no appearance, judgment was entered against him by the same name. Afterwards, and without notice *236to the defendant, the plaintiff, on his own motion, obtains an order from the court to amend the judgment by altering the name of George to Gordon, in which state the judgment now stands.
It is very evident that the amendment is not sustained by the previous proceedings. The action is against one person and the judgment against another. We have no power to determine, on the application of the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- State v. LampeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Manson, Iver & York v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Youlian v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Peckham v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Brum v. IvinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.