Legal Opinion

State v. Lampe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1965PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The defendant does not seek to withdraw his plea of guilty nor does he seek a new trial. He had counsel and by his admittedly voluntary plea of guilty the defendant waived all defenses and non jurisdictional defects except that the information charged no offense. Hawkins v. State, ante, p. 443, 132 N. W. (2d) 545; Anno. 42 A. L. R. (2d) 1013; 14 Am. Jur., Criminal Law, p. 953, sec. 272. By the plea, the defendant admitted the facts charged but not the crime and in this respect a plea of guilty is like a demurrer. Nor has the defendant 'waived his right to question the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hawkins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In re CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Peckham v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Spoo v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. ReppinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Champlain v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. MacK v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State Ex Rel. Skinkis v. TreffertCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  5. E.B. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API