Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Agency v. Penzner
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1970No. Civ. 1106PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARGANO, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant a new trial. The chronology is this:
Plaintiff, a public entity, commenced this action on May 4, 1966, to condemn two parcels of real property owned in fee by defendant, William L. Penzner. The complaint named City of Fresno Mall Assessment District No. 1, a special assessment district formed pursuant to the Pedestrian Mall Law of 1960 (Sts. & Hy. Code, div. 13, § 11000 et seq.), as one of the defendants. This special assessment district may levy assessments against property located within its boundaries, and the unpaid…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kirkwood v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Wilson v. BevilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- City of Inglewood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Lynbar, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- City of Vallejo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Musgrove v. Ambrose PropertiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- City of Ontario v. KelberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People Ex Rel. Department of Water Resources v. GianniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hy-Grade Auto CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.