Legal Opinion

County of San Diego v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1980No. Civ. 16553PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STANIFORTH, J.

Defendant John M. Miller appeals from a judgment entered, after a nonjury trial, denying his claim to status as holder of an option to purchase real property, to share in proceeds flowing from a pretrial settlement of the condemnation action brought by the County of San Diego against the landowners, Charles and Winifred Provence.

Facts

The Provences were the owners of 22 acres of land in Chula Vista, California. On December 30, 1971, Miller obtained a written option to purchase the 22 acres from the Provences for a purchase price of $225,000 or in the alternative $200,000…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Redevelopment Agency v. Contra Costa Theatre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Marshall v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. City of Perris v. StamperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Metropolitan Water District v. Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  5. City of Perris v. StamperCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API