Legal Opinion

City of Ontario v. Kelber

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1973No. Civ. No. 12450PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAMURA, J.

The condemnee in the underlying eminent domain proceeding appeals from an order determining that he is responsible for ad valorem taxes accruing on the subject property to the date of recordation of the final order of condemnation.

The pertinent facts are not in dispute.

The City of Ontario (city) commenced eminent domain proceedings to acquire Kelber’s property for.airport purposes. The issue of just compensation was heard by a jury and judgment of condemnation was entered on July 29, 1970. On May 24, 1972, following the city’s unsuccessful appeal from the judgment,1 the city…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Peninsula Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bellflower City School District v. SkaggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Brick v. CazauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. City of Ontario v. KelberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District v. MuzziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Simon Newman Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Mountain Water v. DORMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Mountain Water v. DORMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Mountain Water v. DORMontana Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API