Legal Opinion
Burhoe v. Whaland
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 30, 1976No. 7114PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.
The plaintiff appeals under RSA 400-A:24 (Supp. 1975) and RSA ch. 541 from an order of the insurance commissioner barring him from holding a license for a period of three years. The commissioner found that the plaintiff was guilty of “twisting”, that is, that the plaintiff had made a misrepresentation for the purpose of inducing a policyholder to surrender insurance in one company and to take out a policy in another like company. RSA 402:47, :49. The plaintiff challenges the adequacy of the notice, the admission of certain evidence, and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Royer v. State Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Scarborough v. ArnoldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Storrs v. Lutheran Hospitals & Homes Society of America, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Bennett v. ThomsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.