Legal Opinion

Beene v. Cook

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 20, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I

SHRIVER, J.

The parties will be referred to as plaintiffs and defendant as they appeared in the Court below.

These two actions of damage arose from the same accident and were tired together and have been consolidated for this appeal.

There were two trials of these cases in the Court below. At the first trial, after the jury had retired to consider its verdict, tlie plaintiffs moved the Court for a leave to take a non-snit and said motion was granted.

Defendant insists that this action resulted in a dismissal of the canses with prejudice and that the rights of action of the plaintiffs were at an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tallent v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  2. Morris v. BollingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
  3. Wright v. DormanTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. SansomTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. McCanless v. State Ex Rel. HammTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Joey Leon Smith v. Jeff Thornburg, Kenneth Slagle, Chris Line, Jim Claiborne, Ron Trentham, Mark Fortner, and the City of Knoxville, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Justus v. WoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Guy Rose v. Great Northern Railway Company, and International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers, Helpers, Roundhouse and Railway Shop LaborersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
  4. Young v. Costner-Eagleton Motors, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Justus v. WoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API