McCanless v. State Ex Rel. Hamm
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green
This is a mandamus suit brought by the relator to compel the Commissioner of Finance and Taxation to issue to relator a license to do business as a liquor dealer in Nashville. From a judgment in favor of the relator the Commissioner has appealed in error to this Court.
The propriety of the judgment of the trial court is to be tested by the evidence heard in- the case. The relator insists that there is no motion for a new trial nor a bill of exceptions to which this Court can look and accordingly moves for a judgment here affirming the judgment below. We first consider this motion.
The judgment…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Dunn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Citizens' Bank & Trust Co. v. BaylesTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Saperstein v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- McCanless, Com'r v. KleinTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
- Waller v. SkeletonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Fairchild v. United Service CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Ketner v. ClaboTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Veal v. Mayor of DyersburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.